Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 May 12

May 12

File:Mighty Young Joe GMSC Badge.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to fail WP:NFCC8, individual fair use logos available in respective articles, addition of a "handshake" icon doesn't seem to increase a reader's knowledge. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 03:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Frequency.PNG

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, low quality, seems redundant to File:Sine waves different frequencies.svg. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 04:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 07:11, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:James Henry Moyle.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Likely non-free image, file has copyright marking. Uploaded in 2016 with claim of permission and CC license, but no response from uploader when requested to confirm permission was obtained. Image no longer in use on Wikipedia, has been replaced by PD image from Commons. --Michael Snow (talk) 07:50, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:11, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Logo of the National Assembly (Hungary).svg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Unclear copyright status, defaulting to status quo (non-free). @Kys5g: Please be advised that these kinds of questions are better suited for Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, thanks -Fastily 01:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hungarian works by official authorities (governmental works aren't copyrighted. Kys5g^talk! 01:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you clarify? I don't understand how that's a reason to delete the logo. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:09, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the nomination proposes to relicense the logo as free, not to delete it.

According to the Commons page on Hungarian copyright rules, only edicts of government are exempt from copyright. We seem to derive that city coats of arms are exempt since they are introduced by explicit regulations. Do we know whether this is also the case for the logo at hand? As a secondary matter, do we have a source for the vectorisation? If not done automatically, the svg rendering may well also bear program copyright. Felix QW (talk) 12:35, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:13, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Visagesdenfants.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced by the original film poster, PD on Commons: c:File:Visages d'enfants, affiche.jpg. Yann (talk) 12:53, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as replaceable with a free alternative. hinnk (talk) 23:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dolphinarium discotheque suicide bombing by Victor Brindatch oil on canvas painting 100x130.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't meet WP:NFCC8 Contextual Significance. The image is being used in the article Dolphinarium discotheque massacre. The fair use rationale states "for visual identification of the person in question, at the top of his/her biographical article" but the article is not biographical. The article is not about the file/art in question, the art is merely illustrating the topic of the article, and does not add significant understanding of the article topic. Consigned (talk) 15:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Neither the painting nor the painter are mentioned in the article. hinnk (talk) 23:17, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Churchslogo.svg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also affects:

We typically don't keep non-free former logos unless there is significant commentary about them. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:39, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is probably the wrong place to ask, I think this image may be ineligible for copyright. I wasn't sure, so I left it as non-free. If someone better educated can take a look and change the license, would be great. Thank you. Ben Stone 18:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is a borderline case. We should follow the precautionary principle if we're not sure. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Valenzuela16Dec2023 16.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of a recent parade float. On Wikimedia Commons, dozens of images of parade floats have been deleted already (for example, c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Festival of Fantasy Parade and c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Teemo.JPG). As English Wikipedia follows U.S. copyright law, this commercially-licensed image infringes the copyright of the float designer and must be deleted from the website. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Valenzuela16Dec2023 12.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of copyrighted artwork on the truck. Too prominent to be de minimis. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Valenzuela16Dec2023 15.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same case as #File:Valenzuela16Dec2023 16.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.